<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Current Cost &#8216;Envi&#8217; CC128 Teardown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.silly-science.co.uk/2010/03/04/current-cost-envi-cc128-teardown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.silly-science.co.uk/2010/03/04/current-cost-envi-cc128-teardown/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=current-cost-envi-cc128-teardown</link>
	<description>Electronics, Programming and Hacking About</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oaklands</title>
		<link>http://www.silly-science.co.uk/2010/03/04/current-cost-envi-cc128-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-1795</link>
		<dc:creator>oaklands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silly-science.co.uk/?p=56#comment-1795</guid>
		<description>I believe the rf modules uses are the RFM01 (rx) and RFM02 (tx) from hoperf and not the RFM12(B)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the rf modules uses are the RFM01 (rx) and RFM02 (tx) from hoperf and not the RFM12(B)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silly-scientist</title>
		<link>http://www.silly-science.co.uk/2010/03/04/current-cost-envi-cc128-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>silly-scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silly-science.co.uk/?p=56#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Yeah I think you are right. I don&#039;t have the board to hand (or apart anymore! its in use on my desk) - but the only other thing I could think that it would be the crystal for the microcontroller, but I think that the microchip part will most likely use internal oscillator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I think you are right. I don&#8217;t have the board to hand (or apart anymore! its in use on my desk) &#8211; but the only other thing I could think that it would be the crystal for the microcontroller, but I think that the microchip part will most likely use internal oscillator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.silly-science.co.uk/2010/03/04/current-cost-envi-cc128-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silly-science.co.uk/?p=56#comment-467</guid>
		<description>Which is the thermistor for the internal temp sensor?  I&#039;d rather be able to remove it, add some long wires, attach the thermistor and put it outside.  I&#039;m much more interested in how temperature outside will affect my energy usage, not inside temp.  Is it that little silver cylinder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is the thermistor for the internal temp sensor?  I&#8217;d rather be able to remove it, add some long wires, attach the thermistor and put it outside.  I&#8217;m much more interested in how temperature outside will affect my energy usage, not inside temp.  Is it that little silver cylinder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Buehner</title>
		<link>http://www.silly-science.co.uk/2010/03/04/current-cost-envi-cc128-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Buehner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silly-science.co.uk/?p=56#comment-279</guid>
		<description>I feel really glad after I discovered this site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel really glad after I discovered this site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bukmacher</title>
		<link>http://www.silly-science.co.uk/2010/03/04/current-cost-envi-cc128-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>bukmacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silly-science.co.uk/?p=56#comment-276</guid>
		<description>You post awsome articles, i have bookmarked for future referrence !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You post awsome articles, i have bookmarked for future referrence !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Claude WIppler</title>
		<link>http://www.silly-science.co.uk/2010/03/04/current-cost-envi-cc128-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Claude WIppler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 09:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silly-science.co.uk/?p=56#comment-56</guid>
		<description>That looks like a HopeRF RFM12B transceiver. Operating at 433 MHz, judging from the antenna wire length. See http://www.hoperf.com/rf_fsk/rfm12b.htm - it&#039;s the same module I use, see http://cafe.jeelabs.net/lab/jn4/

ZigBee is a protocol. So they are probably using the ZigBee protocol through the RFM12B. There is an open source implementation at http://freaklabs.org/index.php/FreakZ-Open-Source-Zigbee-Stack.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks like a HopeRF RFM12B transceiver. Operating at 433 MHz, judging from the antenna wire length. See <a href="http://www.hoperf.com/rf_fsk/rfm12b.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.hoperf.com/rf_fsk/rfm12b.htm</a> &#8211; it&#8217;s the same module I use, see <a href="http://cafe.jeelabs.net/lab/jn4/" rel="nofollow">http://cafe.jeelabs.net/lab/jn4/</a></p>
<p>ZigBee is a protocol. So they are probably using the ZigBee protocol through the RFM12B. There is an open source implementation at <a href="http://freaklabs.org/index.php/FreakZ-Open-Source-Zigbee-Stack.html" rel="nofollow">http://freaklabs.org/index.php/FreakZ-Open-Source-Zigbee-Stack.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Energy Monitor &#8211; part 2 &#171; Silly Science</title>
		<link>http://www.silly-science.co.uk/2010/03/04/current-cost-envi-cc128-teardown/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Energy Monitor &#8211; part 2 &#171; Silly Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silly-science.co.uk/?p=56#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] pins? Check again&#8230; nope, seems fine. So I decide its time to void the warranty (follow these CC128 teardown instructions at your own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pins? Check again&#8230; nope, seems fine. So I decide its time to void the warranty (follow these CC128 teardown instructions at your own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

